<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Michigan and or Florida Do Over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/2008/02/07/a-michigan-and-or-florida-do-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/2008/02/07/a-michigan-and-or-florida-do-over/</link>
	<description>2008 Presidential Election News Twenty-Four Hours a Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:32:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John fitness trainers Austin TX</title>
		<link>http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/2008/02/07/a-michigan-and-or-florida-do-over/comment-page-1/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>John fitness trainers Austin TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/2008/02/07/a-michigan-and-or-florida-do-over/#comment-2175</guid>
		<description>They want an electoral mulligan. The big complaint I keep hearing it that the people of FL and MI deserve to have their voices heard. Damn straight they do AND they actually have. The democratic voters in both those states elected people to represent their interests who saw fit to ignore the rules of the national nominating process.   The voters of FL and MI should have their say.  They did and will. The next time they vote they ought to vote for people other than the knuckleheads that decided to disenfranchise them.  48 out of 50 states managed to get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They want an electoral mulligan. The big complaint I keep hearing it that the people of FL and MI deserve to have their voices heard. Damn straight they do AND they actually have. The democratic voters in both those states elected people to represent their interests who saw fit to ignore the rules of the national nominating process.   The voters of FL and MI should have their say.  They did and will. The next time they vote they ought to vote for people other than the knuckleheads that decided to disenfranchise them.  48 out of 50 states managed to get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPJ</title>
		<link>http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/2008/02/07/a-michigan-and-or-florida-do-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>SPJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electiongeek.com/blog/2008/02/07/a-michigan-and-or-florida-do-over/#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>Michigan sooo needs a &quot;do over&quot;  Either the DNC should not seat the delegates, because that was the premise under which the primary was held, or a new vote needs to happen.  There is no way the original vote should count -- only Clinton was on the ballot and there was no campaign.  There&#039;s a pretty cute Michigan Do Over logo at http://www.cafepress.com/michigandems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan sooo needs a &#8220;do over&#8221;  Either the DNC should not seat the delegates, because that was the premise under which the primary was held, or a new vote needs to happen.  There is no way the original vote should count &#8212; only Clinton was on the ballot and there was no campaign.  There&#8217;s a pretty cute Michigan Do Over logo at <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/michigandems" rel="nofollow">http://www.cafepress.com/michigandems</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
