Buying the Superdelegates, Obama Spends Three Times As Much as Clinton


March 29th, 2008

From McClatchy:

When Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill endorsed Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, she said she’d found a candidate who “gives us a reason to believe again.”

Obama believed in her, too, donating $10,000 from his political action committee to McCaskill’s 2006 campaign. She received nothing from the PAC of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.

And when California Rep. Doris Matsui endorsed Clinton, she said the former first lady had been “a consistent champion and friend” of Asian Americans. Clinton’s PAC had also befriended Matsui, giving $5,000 to her campaign. Matsui received nothing from Obama’s PAC.

Both McCaskill and Matsui are among the nearly 800 superdelegates who’ll have a big say in who heads the Democratic ticket this fall. While both women say the PAC contributions didn’t influence their choice for president, a study by the Center for Responsive Politics concludes that campaign contributions have become a fairly reliable predictor of whose side a superdelegate will take.

And if that’s the case, it’s good news for Obama. Since 2005, his PAC has donated $710,900 to superdelegates, more than three times as much as Clinton’s PAC has. Her PAC distributed $236,100 to superdelegates during the three-year period.



Posted in Barack Obama | 3 Comments »

3 Responses to “Buying the Superdelegates, Obama Spends Three Times As Much as Clinton”
  1. Isabel Maione Says:

    What’s it come to. THe one with the most money becomes President, or the one who comes from a hate church becomes President? Our President should be proud of this country to stand up and fight for it!

  2. Jolludog Loll Says:

    The party is over for the democratic party. It’s time for a new party, may be called the American Labor Party (ALP), the MiddleClass Party, the Common Sense party, or even the Commons party. But millions of democrats like me are fed up with the fact that the democratic party has become the party of the corrupt, the devious, the extremists and unAmerican.

  3. Tim Says:

    Here is a thought, if HillPac had spent more money, (would have if they had the money to begin with)

    Would this be a big deal at all?

    I expect if Hill had spent more money in a particular market there would be no story at all.

    Funny how some stories seem to matter to some more than other stories.

Leave a Reply




Upcoming Events

  • July 14th 2009
    • Congressional Election
    • California 32nd


  • November 3rd 2009
    • Gubernatorial Elections
    • New Jersey
    • Virginia