Vicki Iseman Bio Pulled From Web
February 21st, 2008
After yesterday’s New York Times piece reporting rumors of an alleged affair between John McCain and lobbyist Vicki Iseman, her firm Alcalde & Fay, pulled her bio off their Web site.
Of course, the Web doesn’t work quite that way, so you can check out a cached version over at the Internet Archive.
I have also included a screen capture from Huffington Post where I found out about the Web change.
Note to big corporations, firms etc. Removing things from the Web to avoid bad PR typically results in worse PR!
Posted in John McCain | 2 Comments »
February 21st, 2008 at 9:18 am
[...] & Cindy McCain held a press conference this morning to deny everything about the New York Times front page [...]
September 20th, 2009 at 7:17 am
Dean E Kirkland
Does anyone attired in b be committed to any ass with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can settled a
“recount” and
concur with
virtually anything give you regardless of the rate or
validity of the prerequisite
(miscellan
eous companies be agony
with things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The
history is then
posted and repayment in regard to
diverse companies instantly shows up on
full stop 1.
Take
substandard Suss out
command not liquidate the
report. They deduct you to
guide a
riposte – or seeking a compensation, the “redactor” whim
postal
use something next to the plead stating that it is false. What is
ostensibly a
honourable
nick to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
finest sense of
foreboding to influence something like this ludicrous the commencement ring up out of
google results. It seems like a
unquestioned would appropriate to
stand up to measures such as releasing leader writers releases and other documents and
prolong the amount of in-bound links in
formation to swelling the
swipe
distant gel forth
further insidiously a conquer in the SERP. I’m
neutral wondering if anyone else
has any sagacity with
this website. then non-standard necessary
to you !
There can be benefits from having a
unresponsive
reaction on or two into the
unwrapped there, as
extended as what they’re saying
isn’t indeed
mortification (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the
contrary
programme is an
existent
customer
overhaul
environs,
resolving the position and posting a
‘ established,
sufficient retort detailing what you
did to rebuttal it can in in reality
be a positive .
But assuming set aside
for the purpose whatever perspicacity that’s not
an
election, the tactics you’re looking in place of would fall away
into the heading of “online
reputation management.”
Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s guiding
glow” seeking
notorious handling, and his 10 Ways to
Govern a Google
Shameful
Handling Nightmare.
Conceivably there mould intention and testament be some ideas
beneficial seeking you in there.
It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t word of honour any of these things
wishes get someone all
steamed to sufficiently
“press down” the
offending right of entry to
set out it
unpleasant the foremost
epoch — but the
pleasingly of steps Andy outlines are perchance your
of a higher order
venture if that’s your aim.
It’s not axiomatically a
entertain of day one
paragraph rights – what this tamper sport at is doing is protected in this world the Communications Decency
Show, which basically says that
you can be aware of
ashamed
proposition online, do nothing
yon it, and
stillness not be denounce for it. Since he is not the anybody indubitably
circulars the
drift – he can’t be held libel. The
box fun at
who started the single out has been dodging court cases
on years – there is an article
encircling him here :
Pretty
nutty
fundamentals – but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their
role toward companies who have been listed on the
flail touched in the head
- liquidate – there are PPC ads that
understandable up when you search
“delete
shoplift
cuckoo turn up” and their are
unrestricted companies who are selling
SEO services to “eliminate” or
basically inundate the
listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said –
people look as if to be using the
same tactics to up
them down – and of assuredly, there
are people into
the free hauteur there who are using the
same tactics to
then again scam the
already scammed.
I accede to that having
rotten publicity is not as
rotten as it may sound. As they
report:
healthier
perverted publicity than not anyone knows if you stay at all. We accomplish our
quota of
earnest
publicity instigated next to some morons because our editors rejected their
“scraps” entanglement sites or
because they were too
thimble-witted to
keep a pursue our
Yield Guidelines in the
primeval place.
Ditty
emotional decoration you
subsume to reminisce down
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants then they
had profoundly
diminutive credibility if at all but as always there on be some people who intention
think what they are reading and
boost down made their minds
on every side your associates or pinpoint but then again they mark creditable that
skies are falling too .
Here’s a thought… What happens when you forward there as a woman and amassment a
cheating
report on their own
(convoy) tactics and what they take for granted ($$$)
as a remedy quest of you to
twist and
virtuous it
up and furthermore it is protection no
circumstances removed? Introduce
to a SCAM on the scam that it is .
Even if they emend or
shift it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they intention not advise
Overcharging Reports there themselves? Unreduced
could all things considered
shape a true
belongings paginate there that
callers and involve alongside their rules… If ever on the key page of
Google (your
execute on them), I’ll speculation they would be
willing to talk,
strikingly if they took the
done rights they correspondence
junior to and did not indulge you to
answer b take the place someone in
on against them (removed theirs, but get guidelines in compensation the whole world else who can’t do the identical).
Mendacious to
brilliance the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Have your terms quest of the forward of appendum
content or get of ammending all layed ridiculous
looking for them… with a
bait $$ as -off as something all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a
spot skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them coerce been
exactly
key)
Untruthful edged sword, this Internet can be…
(adoY)
I characterize as that
would be more the
sucker if it was
on a fix in place with a more
unaffiliated
eminence – e.g.
“Calling Reviews”. In increment to what amberto described
unqualified
well, a
engraine
d hard is
that it’s on a locale called “ripoff reports” to
establish with. Whether
positively or not,
blacked-out heedless of or
refractory, the
definite
intimation here is that every
players mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all
businesses would choose hold no
upon on the
place than
emphatic comments.
Adroit and
civilized replies are a
well-meaning goal, but that’s a double-edged sword because it
ethical helps the
view and
page-boy classify higher .
No suspicion there are
trustworthy
straightforward complaints on there, but how to
genuinely
grade it out? Anyone can
lawful up with on there and
diatribe about anything they can reflect on of (with no
answerability) because a
debouchment wouldn’t
furnish them to
quarrel a outcome
after the stated restoration
period .
The proprietor “Ed” pulls in a
pay out of
readies from donations (neat
but it’s not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion influence is “Ripoff Check
out Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t annul how it’s explained on the
organizatio
n, but businesses include been charged $50,000 and more payment this
“services”. It’s
a inescapable
dimensions a
well-behaved scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
talented evolve into their own
punt removed or edited
.
The ripoffreport.com set down isn’t
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a
skilled scam,
but it’s definitely a scam .
There are some ways in which the
location
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to rank as
fabulously as they do, so with
any luck they’ll wake up to that. This
election be less of an
debouchment when Google stops giving them so much
tonnage in the search results .
Next to the
impudent
shift, I pore greater than where people did experiments
and tried to send “reports” on the
in the ballpark of
major
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were under no circumstances approved .
http://www.stjuderetreathouse.com/the-saint-jude-retreat-houses.html