Another Nonsense Article
February 27th, 2007
“The Clintons’ Latest Project is to Contrive Ways to Knock Barack Obama Off His White Horse and Muddy Him Up a Little”
This is what I call a “no crap” article. Why? Because it’s an entire article telling us something we already know in a way that makes it seem like it is giving us insight when really its just pulling together a ton of things we could have figured out by ourselves. It also often makes a person look bad or good for basically doing nothing.
Since the Obama/Hillary scuff there has been tons of these articles. Here is the premise. Hillary Clinton is going to try and beat Barack Obama in the primary by finding things that would make people want to vote for her and not him. Wow, fantastic, what a concept. So basically she is running for office in an election. Lets go to print I think we have a winner!
A few weeks ago the big news was that all of these candidates were going to raise money. “Hillary Plans on Raising Money, John Edwards Sets Goal of Raising Money, Mitt Romney Would Really Like to Raise Money!” Wow newspapers, wow.
Every election year its the exact same story. “Candidate X Is Set to Raise More Money This Time Than Was Raised Last Time” or, “Election Most Expensive Yet!” Isn’t that the point? Don’t things often grow over time? If the election didn’t cost more in 2008 than it did in 2004 I think we would have a pretty big problem with the economy. Another news flash for you? It took more dollars to elect George W. Bush than it did Herbert Hoover. Can you guess why?
Basically every one of these articles is stating the blatantly obvious. A candidate for a party’s nomination wants to win that nomination which will come at the expense of other candidates who want it. Meanwhile it will cost more, the likelihood that one of these candidates will belong to an ethnic group/gender or other population that has never been elected before will rise as will the amount of time covered on the election? Why?
1) That is what politicians do.
2) Things cost more over time and as the economy/population grows
3) There has only ever been white males over the age of 35 who have held the office but more than half the population is woman and an increasing percentage gay, black, hispanic or of other or mixed descent
4) There are more media outlets available to the consumer and more devices that need content.
I just wrote the meat of 90% of the articles being written. All I have to do is throw in some quotes from bloggers, ex campaign workers and “analysts” from some non-profit think tank or university and I would be golden.
Sphere: Related ContentPosted in Election 2008, Media Criticism |
Related Posts